/* remove this */ Blogger Widgets /* remove this */

Friday, April 13, 2012

HTET : Supreme Court of India : Continuance of Guest Teachers in Haryana till regular teachers not appointed

HTET : Supreme Court of India : Continuance of Guest Teachers in Haryana till regular teachers not appointed


For authenticated copy, Contact Supreme Court of India
See Judgement :
-------------------

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petitions(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)....../2012
CC 5956-5957/12

(Under Article 136 of the Constitution against the final judgment and order dated 30/03/2011 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh in CWP No.6090 of 2010 and against the final judgment and order dated 15/03/2012 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in Civil
Misc.No.17483 of 2011)

NARESH KUMAR & ORS.ETC.ETC. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

STATE OF HARYANA & ORS.ETC. Respondent(s)

(With appln(s) for permission to file SLP and with prayer for interim relief )

WITH SLP(C) NO. 10818 of 2012

(With appln.(s)for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and permission to place addl.documents on record and with prayer for interim relief and office report)

Date: 30/03/2012 
These Petitions were called on for hearing today.

CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALTAMAS KABIR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR

For Petitioner(s) Mr. G.E.Vahanvati, A.G.I.
in SLP(C)10818/12 Mr. H.S. Hooda, A.G.Haryana.
Mr. Rohit Sharma, Adv.
Mr. Abhijat P.Medh, AOR.

Sri Gopal Subramanium, Sr. Adv.
in SLP(C)..../12 Ms. Indu Malhotra, Sr. Adv.
CC 5956-5957/12 Ms. Mahalakshmi Pavani, Adv.
Sri G.Balaji, Adv.
SLP(C)...CC 5956-5957/12,etc.

2

Ms. Chinmaya Chandra, Adv.
Sri Mukesh Kumar Singh, Adv.
for M/S.Mahalakshmi Balaji & Co.,Advs.

For Respondent(s) Mr. K.V. Vishwanathan, Sr. Adv.
Mr. John Mathew,AOR.

UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R

1. Permission to file SLPs granted.

2. Three Special Leave Petitions have been filed,two by Mr. Naresh Kumar & Ors., in SLP(C)......CC Nos.5956-5957 of 2012,against the final judgment and order dated 30th March, 2011, passed in CWP No.6090 of 2010 and the final judgment and order dated 15th March, 2012, in Civil Misc.No.17483 of 2011, passed by the Punjab & Haryana High Court, and SLP(C)No.10818 of 2012, filed by the State of Haryana against the final judgment and order dated 15th March, 2012, passed by the Punjab & Haryana High Court in C.M.No.17483/11 in Civil Writ Petition No.6090 of 2010.

3. The subject-matter of all the three Special Leave Petitions is with regard to the appointment of 'Guest Teachers' and their continuance, without recruitment of teachers in the various educational institutions, by the
regular process of recruitment. The issue involved appears to have been considered by the Punjab & Haryana High Court, in several matters, since quite some time.In fact, we have been able to glean from the facts as disclosed that this issue came up for consideration before the Division Bench of the Punjab & Haryana High
Court in CWP No.6090 of 2010, which has been questioned in SLP(C)......CC 5956-5957 of 2012.

The said writ petition was disposed of by the judgment and order of the Punjab & Haryana High Court dated 30th March, 2011, wherein it was mentioned that the specific challenge which had been made in the writ petition was with regard to the decision of the respondents to extend the services of 'Guest Teachers' appointed under contract basis in various Government schools of the State of Haryana
In the said Writ Petition, it was also indicated that the extension was proposed for a further period of one year with effect from 1st April,2011.

Incidentally, the respondent No.6 in the said writ petition is duly represented before us and he is a candidate for consideration for appointment in the regular course.The said Writ Petition was disposed of in terms of a
schedule, which had been prepared by the respondent-authorities, and the Division Bench of the Punjab & Haryana High Court made it very clear that while it would be open to the State to extend the tenure of the' GuestTeachers' at all levels, such extension should not be beyond 31st March,2012. It was also indicated that on the expiry of the said date, i.e.31st March, 2012, services of all the 'Guest Teachers' should be understood to have lapsed in terms of the said judgment and it would not be open for the State to continue such 'Guest Teachers' in service. It is,in fact, the said directions which had led to the filing of the Special Leave Petitions. The Division Bench had also indicated that there would be no further appointment of 'Guest Teachers' during the next Academic year, starting from 1st April, 2011, and the short-fall,if any, in the
availability of teachers would have to be made up by the State by undertaking a fresh process/ exercise of posting and re-posting of teachers according to the needs of each school.

Various other directions were also given regarding appointment of teachers on regular basis.

4. Mr. Gopal Subramanium, learned senior advocate, appearing for the petitioners in the said Special Leave Petitions, has submitted that the direction referred to herein above given by the Division Bench of the High Court would create a situation in which after 1st April, 2012, there would be no teachers available in
place of the 'Guest Teachers' and unless the directions was extended till at least regular appointments were made, the students in the various institutions would suffer. Of course,

Mr. Vishwanathan, learned senior counsel, has also voiced his apprehension that this may lead to continuance of the process of continuing with the 'Guest Teachers'.

5. The other Special Leave Petition has been filed by the State of Haryana, in regard to the order passed by the Division Bench of the High Court on 15th March, 2012,in C.M.No.17483/11 in Civil Writ Petition No.6090 of 2010. By the said order, the Division Bench of the High Court rejected the prayer of the State of Haryana for extension of time to implement the directions contained in the order dated 30th March, 2011.

The learned Attorney General for India, appearing for the State of Haryana, however, brought to our notice an order subsequently passed by the same Division Bench on 20th March, 2012, whereby a scheme for filling up the vacant posts in order to comply with the directions contained in the order of 30th March, 2011, had been placed before the Court and the same had been accepted, in fact, a prayer had been made for about ten months' time to give effect to the said scheme. The learned Attorney General for India pointed out that in the said order, the Court had observed that in view of the scheme it was no longer necessary for the Court to monitor the actions of the State any further. 

On the contrary, the Court deemed it appropriate to close the writ petition, which was in the nature of a public interest litigation, by directing the State of Haryana to initiate and comply with and take necessary action in terms of the averments made in the affidavit dated 19th March, 2012, affirmed by the Financial Commissioner and Member Secretary to the Government of Haryana, School Education Department, and to adhere to the time schedule mentioned in the said affidavit.

6. The learned Attorney General for India, submitted that there being two contrary directions, one passed on 15th March, 2012, and the other on 20th March, 2012, accepting the scheme, and, in fact, extending the time for giving effect to the scheme, the State of Haryana had filed the Special Leave Petition to clarify the differences in the two orders.

7. Having heard the learned Attorney General for India, Mr. Subramanium and Mr. Vishwanathan, learned senior advocates, for the parties and also keeping in mind the submissions made by Mr. Vishwanathan, that the intention of the Division Bench of the High Court was that no further appointments of 'Guest Teachers' should be made after 1st April, 2012, and that the vacancies should be filled up by posting and reposting
teachers in the different institutions, we feel that the two things should really be kept separate,notwithstanding the apprehension voiced by Mr. Vishwanathan, that this could lead to continuance of appointment of 'Guest Teachers'.

8. We make it very clear that as directed by the Division Bench of the High Court, no fresh appointments of 'Guest Teachers' will be made from 1st April, 2012. However, since students also cannot be made to suffer on account of the delay in the appointment of regular teachers, we direct that the exercise indicated in the
scheme,must be completed within the time specified in the scheme and no further extension or deviation therefrom will be permitted.

9. Till then, the 'Guest Teachers' may be allowed to continue to function, as they have been doing so far.

10. We once again reiterate that the recruitment of teachers on the regular basis shall not be supplemented or replaced by this procedure of appointing 'Guest Teachers' for the sake of convenience.

11. The Special Leave Petitions are disposed of with the aforesaid observations.

12. There will be no orders as to costs.

(Sheetal Dhingra) (Juginder Kaur)
COURT MASTER Assistant Registrar

Source : http://courtnic.nic.in/supremecourt/temp/pc%205956-595712p.txt
For authenticated copy, Contact Supreme Court of India

25 comments:

  1. @ ALL

    BHAI JAB KHARE JI KO PAISE DE KAR SLP HO SAKTI HAI TO SC ME PIL KU NHI JABKI SAB KO PTA HAI KI PIL SE JALDI NYAYA MILEGA AGAR KAL PIL FILE HOTA HAI TO 7 DIN KE ANDER RAHAT MILEGI AUR AISA KEVAL IS LIYE NHI KI MAI DEENGE MAR RHA HU BALKI AAP NUPUR TALWAR KA CASE DEKH SAKTE HAI COURT NE UNKO EK HI DIN ME RAHAT DI HAI TO AB AAP LOG APNE NETA LOGO SE SAMPARK SAADHE AUR PAISE KI KOI KILLAT NHI HAI JAHA TAK MERE KO PTA HAI KI 3 LAKH HAI FUND PEHLE SE SO TO AB DER KIS BAT KI HAI


    HC PEHLE RN SINGH KO PHIR KHARE SAHAB KO AUR RAWAI COURT KA AISA HAI KI POOCHO NA HAMESA TARIKH PE TARIKH


    AGAR SC ME PIL ME TET MERIT SE LAEKAR SARE POINT RAKHE JAYE TO 1 MONTH KE ANDER SAB KHATAM HO JAYEGA SC SAKT HAI RTE KE IMPLEMENTATION PE JABKI HC ME SHAYAD JUDGE PAGAL HO GYE HAI UNKO PRIORITY KA AADESH BHI NHI SAMAJ AATA HAI BHALE HI WO KITNA IMAANDAR HO LEKINB TAMAM SAARE CASE SE ACCHA HAI KI EK PIL SABHI MUDDO KO INCLUDE KARTE HUE

    JASE -
    STAY---TET MERIT---TET KO RAAD KARNA AUR JITNE HAI SAB INCLUDE KARA KE FILE KARNE KA KAST KARE AUR AISA HAR JILE KE LOG APNE JILE KE NETA SE BOLE .

    NITIN MEHTA JI TO GHAZIABAD SE HAIN UNHE TO AUR AASAANI HOGI WAHI SE DELHI JANE ME AUR VIVEKANAND JI BHI SAMAJH LE KI TET KE LOGO KO SC SE HI RAHAT MILEGI HC SE SC BHI NARAZ HAI FAISLE ME DERI AUR BHARSTACHAAR SE

    AB AAP LOGO PE DEPEND HAI AGAR PRAYAS NA KIYA TO ZINDGI BHAR PACHTAOGE AAGE CHALNE WALE LOGO KO JAGAO YE JIMEDARI AAP KI HAI KU KI YE FUTURE BHI AAP KA HI HAI..........

    ReplyDelete
  2. kal me ek advocate se bat karne ja raha hun or use sara matter bata kar supreme court me PIL ki possibility k bare me puchuga or usi ke according blog par jankari dal dunga. Zubair Ahmad (New Delhi) 09990832796

    ReplyDelete
  3. SC Chalo yaha kuch ni hoga ab ekmatra upaya sc he hai

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hum log majboot loktantra ke majboor nagrik ban kar rah gye hain.....
    Apne adhikaro ki raksha ke liye sc chale
    TEST IS BEST TET IS BEST

    ReplyDelete
  5. Ham log kahi disaheen na ho jaye isliye vivekanand, nitin mehta, sk pathak ji etc se anurodh hai ki wo log is blog par aaye aur aage ki radniti spast kare

    ReplyDelete
  6. डिग्रीधारकों के लिए मांगेंगे तीन साल
    समय : प्रधानमंत्री के साथ मुलाकात के
    दौरान मुख्यमंत्री बीएड
    डिग्रीधारकों को बेसिक शिक्षा परिषद
    द्वारा संचालित स्कूलों में शिक्षक नियुक्त
    करने की अवधि को 31 मार्च 2015
    तक बढ़ाने की मांग भी कर सकते हैं।
    परिषदीय स्कूलों में शिक्षक की नियुक्त के
    लिए शैक्षिक योग्यता स्नातक व
    बीटीसी है। परिषदीय स्कूलों में पौने
    दो लाख शिक्षकों की कमी तो है ही,
    राज्य में हर साल लगभग 15000
    शिक्षक रिटायर भी हो जाते हैं।
    शिक्षकों की नियुक्ति के लिए पर्याप्त
    संख्या में बीटीसी प्रशिक्षणप्राप्त
    अभ्यर्थी उपलब्ध नहीं हैं। शिक्षा के
    अधिकार अधिनियम के तहत
    शिक्षकों की कमी पूरा करने के लिए
    राष्ट्रीय अध्यापक शिक्षा परिषद
    (एनसीटीई) ने पहली जनवरी 2012 तक
    बीएड डिग्रीधारकों को शिक्षक नियुक्त
    करने की छूट दी थी। निर्धारित अवधि में
    बीएड डिग्रीधारकों को शिक्षक नियुक्त
    न कर पाने के कारण राज्य सरकार यह
    समय सीमा बढ़ाकर 30 जून 2012 करने
    की मांग कर चुकी है, लेकिन अब
    मुख्यमंत्री के जरिए इसे बढ़ाकर 31
    मार्च 2015 करने की मंशा है।

    ReplyDelete
  7. Ye news to yahi isara kar raha ki ab bharti me lamba samay lagne wala hai aur sayad ye 2014 ke lok sabha election tak tal jaye....
    Sabhi politician ek jaise hote hai wo jo bhi karte hai usme apna fayda sabse pahle dekhte hai.....pahle maya ne iske liye bharti 2 sal tak talti rahi aur ab akhilesh talega.....

    ReplyDelete
  8. kuch important date hai

    18 april ko meeting hai

    near 28 april CM ka 3 week ka timeline bhi khatam hoga

    30 ko court ka decision se pahele uper ki dono date jayada important hai

    ReplyDelete
  9. Ab lagta hai sab log is blog par timepas kar rahe hai.
    Mujhe chodkar sabhi aur ab to blog editor v kyoki 2015 tak niyukti hogi

    ReplyDelete
  10. Ye kya ho raha hai..sab log apni apni story ga rahd hai.
    Tet ke bare me koi latest news ho to use share kare.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Now Somebody used name of "Blog Editor "
    and commenting - khoobsurat

    Pichlee baar mene kaha tha kee jo bhee - mere baare mein ulta seedha likh raha hai,

    Vo sab apnee maa ar behan ke leeye likh raha hai.

    Mujhe faltu ke comments bilku pasand nahin hai.

    I will use filter for comments.
    ------

    ReplyDelete
  12. ye kumar ke naam se koi bhai anupukt
    comment de raha hai..

    ye mera comment nahi hai.
    kewal tet se related comment hi mai deta hoon...

    jo comment tet se related na ho wo mera nahi samjha jaye...

    ReplyDelete
  13. sab pagal ho gaye hain kisi ko job ki nahi padi hai.. hamare leader laathi khilane me age the, SC jane me sabse peeche.. saala indian ka wasool hi yahi hai "APNA KAAM BANTA, BHAD ME JAYE JANTA".. YAAD RAKHO POORI ZINDAGI PACHTAYOGE JO SC JANE ME DERI KER RAHE HO... 2015 TAK TIME MANGA JA RAHA HAI ,, KHUD SOCHO K GOVT KI KIYA POLICY HAI....

    ReplyDelete
  14. Ye TULSI se ke name se TIME PASS wala coment koun kar raha hai

    Hello sir, time pass karna hai to apne orignal name se coment kar ke karo

    ReplyDelete
  15. Haryana mein jab Regular teachers ko appoint hee nahin karenge to state govt. talam tol kar majbooree dikhayegeee hee.

    1 saal ke time deeya tha to kyon nahin Regular teachers appoint karne kee koshish kee gayee.

    Aur jab HTET kara leeya tab bharteee kyon nahin kee jatee hai

    ReplyDelete
  16. i give only comment related to TET only

    ReplyDelete
  17. Muskan ji apke liye ek acha sugestion hai ki...

    Ek user name blog par ek hi ho usay PRMARY KEY bana dain. Email id + user name makes a PRIMARY KEY

    Thanks

    ReplyDelete
  18. Aap log mera face book profile bhee use kar sakte hai commenet kee leeye :
    http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100003229523165
    (UPTET Prt)
    ----------
    Important comments aap jaroor is blog par dalte rahen

    kyonkee har visitor serach ke time facebook use nahin karta, vo seedhe is BLOG ko dekhta hai

    ReplyDelete
  19. Facebook par aap user ko aasaanee se BLOCK kar sakte hain

    ReplyDelete
  20. hume shamuhik sucide krne ki threat sarkar ko deni ghaiye ,,,,keval drane ke liye ,,,,,,,,,time aane pr hum is threat se apni mang rakhe ,,,,,ki tet ki cross cheaking kra kr dosiyo ko saja or mehanti ko job de verna hum kuch b kr sakte h ,,, y

    ReplyDelete
  21. delhi me agar 1000 tetians jakar dharna de to shayad rajya sarkar aur media k ankh khulegi.main west up k doston se request krta hun k wo is bare me jaldi hi planing kare.humko 10 districts se 100 log chahiye.1000 logo ki bheed bahut hoti hai.

    ReplyDelete
  22. court me writ no 76039 ke date 16/4/12 lagi hai. koi bateyaga ke date kya hai.

    ReplyDelete
  23. some one tell me what is the date of hearing in court. its 16/4/12 on court website. few people said its 30/4/12 . whats is this matter.

    ReplyDelete

Please do not use abusive/gali comment to hurt anybody OR to any authority. You can use moderated way to express your openion/anger. Express your views Intelligenly, So that Other can take it Seriously.
कृपया ध्यान रखें: अपनी राय देते समय अभद्र शब्द या भाषा का प्रयोग न करें। अभद्र शब्दों या भाषा का इस्तेमाल आपको इस साइट पर राय देने से प्रतिबंधित किए जाने का कारण बन सकता है। टिप्पणी लेखक का व्यक्तिगत विचार है और इसका संपादकीय नीति से कोई संबंध नहीं है। प्रासंगिक टिप्पणियां प्रकाशित की जाएंगी।