/* remove this */ Blogger Widgets /* remove this */

Tuesday, July 10, 2012

Jharkhand Primary Teacher Recruitment - Decision by Ranchi Highcourt

Jharkhand Primary Teacher Recruitment - Decision by Ranchi Highcourt


Anjuman Taraqqi-E-Urdu ... vs The State Of Jharkhand on 22 November, 2011
1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 3099 of 2011

----

1.Anjuman Taraqqi-e-Urdu Jharkhand

2.Md. Manzer Hussain

3.Md. Mojahid Alam .... Petitioners Vs.

1.The State of Jharkhand

2.The Director, Primary Education, Govt. of Jharkhand

3.The Jharkhand Academic Council

4.The Secretary, Jharkhand Academic Council. Respondents ------

W.P. (S) No. 6592 of 2011

Krishna Murari Prasad ... ... ... ... Petitioner Vs.

1.State of Jharkhand

2.The Director, Primary Education, Govt. of Jharkhand

3.The Jharkhand Academic Council.. ... Respondents ------

W.P. (PIL) No. 6495 of 2011

Balmiki Chaubey ... ... ... ... ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The State of Jharkhand

2.The Secretary, Department of Human Resources

3.The Director, Primary and Secondary Education

4.The Regional Deputy Director, Education, Ranchi

5.The Jharkhand Academic Council

6.The Secretary, The Jharkhand Academic Council.... Respondents -------

CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.P. BHATT

------

For the Petitioners : Mr. S.P. Jha, Sr. Adv. M/s Manoj Tandon, S.S. Kumar,

N.K. Singh, B. Singh, N. Sharmin,

S. Kumar, L.K. Singh, S. Jha, A.K. Jha

For the Intervener : M/s D. Jerath, R. Krishna, A.K. Yadav For the Resp-State : Mr. Rajiv Ranjan, A.A.G For the J.A.C : Mr. M. Sohail Anwar, Sr. Adv. Mrs. Ruby Parween, Adv.

Reportable ------ Dated 22nd November, 2011 By Court Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the State as well as learned counsel for the Interveners.

2. The petitioners are challenging the entire selection process initiated vide advertisement No. 27/2011 dated 26th March, 2011 by which the respondents want to select and appoint about 18,000 primary teachers in Primary Schools run by the State Government.

3. The recruitment of the primary school teachers in the State of Jharkhand is regulated by the Jharkhand Primary School Appointment Rules, 2002, which has been framed by exercising the power under Article 309 of the Constitution of India. Rule (8) provides for holding two tests, one Preliminary Test and another Final Test, which are required to be cleared before any appointment on the post of teacher for primary classes i.e., for Class of I to Class V in Government Schools can be given. These Rules were amended time to time, which included the amendment made vide notification dated 26th December, 2006 then vide notification dated 14th August, 2007 and vide notification dated 16th September, 2009. Yet another amendment came vide notification dated 23rd October, 2009 and the petitioner has challenged the validity of Clause (III) of Sub-Rule (Ka) of Rule 8 and also proviso to Clause (VI) of Sub-Rule (Ka) of Rule 8 to the extent whereby it has been provided that obtaining of 35 % marks in the case of general category and 30 % marks in tribal language and regional language in the case of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes respectively, shall be compulsory to qualify for main examination for Primary School Teachers appointment in the State of Jharkhand. The petitioner also sought relief to declare Rule 8 (Kha) of Jharkhand Primary School Appointment Rules, 2002 as brought by Rule 3 of Jharkhand Primary School (second amendment) Appointment Rule ultra vires and consequently sought the relief of quashing the Advertisement No. 27 of 2011 published on 26th March, 2011.

4. Facts of the case are that the advertisement, Annexure-7, which is advertisement no. 27 of 2011 was issued to fill up post of 4401 Urdu Assistant Teachers and also for filling up 13,807 posts of Assistant Teacher of other than Urdu Assistant Teachers. The total bifurcation of the seats district-wise and reservation of seats have also been given in detail in the advertisement. The last date for submitting the application form of this selection process was 15.4.2011. The advertisement also contains that in preliminary test, there will be two papers; one of General Knowledge of 50 marks and second will be the paper of Regional/Tribal language of 50 marks. Thereafter, a schedule has been given in the advertisement showing which tribal and regional language will be for a particular district. It is clearly mentioned as a condition that the applicant, who is applying for vacant post in a particular district, shall have to take examination for the languages given against the column of that district. In Clause 5 of the advertisement, it is provided that, for appearing the main examination the candidate shall be required to obtain 35 % marks in 
General Knowledge and Tribal/Regional language for general category and 30% marks for reserved category. Then the separate examination of 300 marks has been prescribed in the advertisement which consists of examination which is as under :-

1.Language 100 marks (Ka)General Teacher-Hindi and English

(Kha)Urdu Teacher-Urdu and English

2.Social Science 100 marks

3.General Science 100 marks 300 marks

5. After advertising these posts and expiry of last date for submitting applications for appointment on the post of primary school teachers in Urdu and General category, on 19.5.2011, another advertisement no. 45 of 2011 was issued whereby the examination which was scheduled to be held on 29.5.2011 was postponed and it was notified that new date will be notified afterwards. Then on 25.5.2011 another notification no. 46 of 2011 was published in the newspaper, whereby it has been declared that the primary teachers test which was initiated by the advertisement no. 27 of 2011 dated 26.3.2011 shall be treated to be at par with the Teachers Eligibility Test (in short TET), which is a test required for getting any appointment on the post of teacher in view of the guidelines issued by the National Council for Teachers Education (in short NCTE) which mandatorily require that only a person who has obtained a TET 5
certificate shall be eligible for appointment on the post of Primary School Teacher. According to the State, to make the selection and appointment of the teachers in the State of Jharkhand in consonance with the national policy, new criteria was prescribed by advertisement no. 46 of 2011. By this advertisement, not only the Primary Teachers Eligibility Test has been made combined test for Primary Teachers Eligibility Test cum TET but entire pattern of test and marking criteria have been changed. The changed pattern and marking are as under :-

1.General Knowledge/Environmental Studies 30 marks

2.Mathematics: 30 marks

3.Language: (Ka)Tribal/Regional language: 30 marks

4.Language: (Kha)Hindi (For Hindi Teachers) Urdu (For Urdu Teachers): 30 marks

5.Child Development and Education : 30 marks Total marks 150 marks

The examination shall be of two hours and minimum pass marks shall be 60 % for general category candidates and for candidates of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes minimum pass marks shall be 50 %. In this advertisement no. 46 of 2011 dated 25.5.2011 again it has been repeated that those candidates who will secure 60 % and 50 % in general category and SC/ST category respectively will be eligible to appear in the main examination. In this very advertisement it is also mentioned that rest of the conditions mentioned in the original advertisement shall remain as it is. Meaning thereby, requirement of obtaining 35% and 30% marks in tribal language and regional language and upon passing this examination, the candidate will have to face Final Test for appointment.

6. Thereafter, another advertisement no. 55 of 2011 was issued by the State by which the date for examination and the centres for examination were notified. The date for examination was fixed as 20.7.2011. The writ petitioner, even before issuance of the advertisement no. 46 of 2011 dated 25.5.2011 approached this Court by filing this Writ Petition on 18.5.2011 and sought the relief as we have already referred above. On 13.09.2011, this Court passed an interim order that the result of the examination shall be subject to the outcome of the instant writ petition. On 14.11.2011, after hearing the parties at length passed the interim order that the State Government shall not issue any appointment orders in the present process of selection.

7. Learned counsel for the petitioner vehemently submitted that the process of selection for appointment once started, it is required to be completed according to the Rules which were in existence and in the present process of selection and appointment everything, i.e., subjects, marking pattern and even the purpose of the examination has been changed after the expiry of last date of submission of application form. Now it has been made a certificate course of TET under the guidelines of the NCTE and then to give appointment without any final test.

8. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submitted that the prescribing of 35% and 30% marks in the regional and tribal language violates the Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and further, such marks have been prescribed without there being any nexus and for any object which can be achieved. Learned counsel for the petitioner vehemently submitted that by this, virtually all posts have been reserved for the members of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes ignoring the fact that 74% of the population in the State of Jharkhand are not belonging to the tribal community and the percentage of the members of tribal community is only 26%. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that the subsequent amendments made by issuing various notifications i.e., notifications dated 14.5.2011, 23.5.2011 are also absolutely illegal and even if not illegal, these notifications are prospective and in fact notification dated 23.5.2011 changing entire examination pattern is not by amending the Rules of 2002 but has been done by an executive order, therefore, change in examination pattern is contrary to Rules of 2002 and therefore, illegal. It is submitted that a process which was started for taking the preliminary test and main examination, has been converted into not only a process of giving appointment by one examination dispensing with the second examination and that too without amending or deleting the relevant Rules which provide for final examination after preliminary test and furthermore, the required minimum marks have been increased from 50% to 60% by executive order. In sum and substance, according to learned counsel for the petitioner, the process of selection and appointment can be completed only according to the Rule which was in existence and none of the subsequent decision can change the procedure so as to detrimental to the interest of the eligible candidates.

9. It will be worthwhile to note here that after the advertisement (Annexure-7) i.e., Advertisement No. 27 of 2011 dated 26.03.2011 no opportunity was given to any of the candidate or person in the State of Jharkhand to apply for the TET if the State Government could have completed this process of selection and appointment on the post of teacher to a certificate course for the TET. Learned counsel for the petitioner also relied upon the judgement of the Hon'ble Supreme Court wherein keeping the regional language as mandatory requirement has not been approved by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. Learned counsel for the petitioner relied upon the judgement of the Supreme Court delivered in the case of Hindi Hitrakshak Samiti & Others Vs. Union of India & Ors. reported in (1990) 2 SCC 352, Kusum Ingots and Alloys Ltd. Vs. Union of India & Anr. reported in (2004) 6 SCC 254 and judgement in the case of Dahiben & Others Vs. Vasanji Kevalbhai & Ors. reported in 1995 Supp (2) SCC 295 which we shall be considering hereinafter.

10. The State has come up with the case that after the enactment of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Eduction Act, 2009, the Government has recognized the right of children to have education, rather say, the children's education has been made compulsory and that is in consonance with the Article 21A of the Constitution of India. In view of the above, large number of teachers are required to be appointed to fulfill the aims and object of the Act of 2009 of free and compulsory education to children in the State. It is also submitted that State of Jharkhand has its peculiar situation as it is dominantly habitated by the members of the Scheduled Tribes and members of the Scheduled Castes and that too in remote village places where children are required to have primary education in their own language i.e., regional and tribal language. It is submitted by learned counsel for the State that the State could not have given any appointment to a person who has not cleared the TET and the State came to know about the guidelines issued by the NCTE on 06.04.2011 i.e., after issuance of Advertisement No. 27 of 2011 dated 26.3.2011, though those guidelines were issued prior, on 11.02.2011.

Therefore, when the State came to know about these guidelines, immediately and without any delay, to make this selection process in consonance with the guidelines of the NCTE, in exceptional circumstances, a decision was taken as one time measure, to have one combined test in place to having separate TET and Teachers Appointment Test. It is submitted that, so has been done as one time measure which is apparent and very clear from the decision of the Government dated 14.05.2011 and that has been notified in the newspaper and was given full publicity. It is submitted that even if such step would not have been taken by the State, then even after the examination under the original advertisement, the State would not have been in a position to give any appointment because of the condition of the NCTE requiring the TET. The subjects have also been changed and marking pattern also have been changed only because of the reason that everything should have been in consonance with the guidelines of the NCTE. It is submitted that no prejudice has been caused to any of the candidates.

11. Learned counsel for the State vehemently submitted that in fact what has been argued by the learned counsel for the petitioners before this Court is beyond what the petitioners have pleaded in his writ petition. Their grievance was confined only to the prescribing minimum pass marks for the two examinations i.e., tribal language and regional language. 11

At the most, it may be said that the petitioners may have grievance of prescribing particular language for a particular district but in writ petition it is not the case of the writ petitioners that the subsequent amendments made by the State are, in any manner, illegal. In view of the above, learned counsel for the State vehemently submitted that this Court should not examine other issues which may be attractive and the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as counsel supporting the petitioner who were permitted to argue because they also have preferred separate writ petitions one in the form of Public Interest Litigation i.e., W.P.(PIL) No. 6495 of 2011 and another W.P.(S) No. 6592 of 2011, are liable to be ignored.

12. Learned counsel for the State further submitted that after filing of W.P. (S) No. 3099 of 2011, both these petitioners themselves appeared in the examination conducted by the State and therefore, by their conduct they themselves have accepted all the changed conditions prescribed for the examination. In W.P.(S) No. 6592 of 2011 the writ petitioner appeared in the examination and has failed then preferred this petition, which is clear from the fact that he has filed the writ petition on 16.11.2011. It is submitted that in view of the above, this writ petition is not maintainable because, if the petitioner would have succeeded in the examination, he would not have challenged the selection process.

13. Learned senior counsel for the State also submitted that large number of vacancies are there in the State of Jharkhand of the teachers and if the selection is quashed and set aside then it will be against the interest of the children of the State of Jharkhand.

14. Learned counsel for the Jharkhand Academic Council, who was entrusted with the task of conducting the examination, submitted that the Jharkhand Academic Council has conducted the examination in view of the direction given by the State Government and in accordance with the Rules of 2002 and they have published the result. It is submitted that about 1,31,000 candidates appeared in the examination.

15. Learned Counsel Sri Delip Jerath, supporting State's decisions, vehemently submitted that the scope of the Courts in the matter where policy decisions are involved is very limited. He heavily relied upon Hon'ble Supreme Court's judgement delivered in the case of Transport and Dock Workers Union & Ors. Vs. Mumbai Port Trust & Anr. reported in (2011) 2 SCC 575 and also relied upon another judgement delivered in the case of Nand Kishore Ojha Vs. Anjani Kumar Singh reported in (2010) 6 SCC 648 wherein the question of taking one time measure has been considered and according to learned counsel Sri Jerath, the State Government has taken a decision to meet with the specific contingency and took the decision to meet with urgent requirement of appointment. It is also submitted that it is nowhere provided that the two examinations could not have been clubbed together so as to have an examination for the TET along with the examination for giving appointment on the post of primary school teachers. It is also submitted that if a classification has been made by creating two classes then that also is justified if it has been done on the basis of the rationale classification.

16. Learned counsel Sri R. Krishna, who appeared as an intervener, submitted that "examination" is not a "selection process for appointment". It is submitted that process of appointment starts only after the eligibility test and, therefore, during this period if any amendment has been made, it is not violative to any of the law. Learned counsel Sri R. Krishna relied upon judgement of the Hon'ble Supreme Court delivered in the case of State of Rajasthan Vs. R. Dayal & Ors. reported in (1997) 10 SCC 419 wherein Hon'ble Supreme Court held that the procedure which was in force at the time of initiation of process of selection shall be the process and according to learned counsel Sri R. Krishna if any change is made prior to date of start of process of selection for appointment then that is legal and valid and cannot take away any vested right of any of the persons.

17. At this juncture, it will be relevant to mention here that according to learned counsel for the State, a writ petition was preferred before the Hon'ble Supreme Court being Civil Writ (C) No. 173 of 2011 to challenge this selection process and therein one Interlocutory Application being I.A. No. 203 of 2011 was also filed but that was dismissed on 9th September, 2011 and thereafter, the present result has been declared on 15.10.2011.

18. We have considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties and perused the facts of the case. It is not in dispute that vide advertisement No. 27 of 2011 dated 26.03.2011, the process of selection and appointment on the post of teachers in the subject of Urdu as well as for general subjects was started and this process was started under the Rules of 2002. The eligibility criteria was fixed as has been given in the Rules of 2002. It is clearly provided in the Rules of 2002 as well as in the said advertisement dated 26.03.2011 that there will be two examinations - one shall be preliminary examination and second will be the main examination. Any candidate of general category who will secure 35% marks in the subject i.e., General Knowledge and in Tribal and Regional Language and any candidate of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe category who secure 30% marks in the same way shall be eligible to appear in the main examination. The last date for submitting the application was 25.04.2011. It is not in dispute that by subsequent notification dated 14.5.2011 and by executive order dated 23.5.2011 (without amending the relevant Rule), the preliminary eligibility test has been converted into altogether new test leaving nothing original to be done under original advertisement, neither examination remained preliminary test nor papers remained same, nor maximum marks for papers remained same, nor minimum pass marks remained same. It is very pertinent that notification dated 14.5.2011 is notification to amend Rules of 2002 but in fact nothing has been added and nothing has been deleted or amended in Clause 8 (Ka) of the Rules of 2002 and this notification is, without amending relevant Rules, only made declaration that rule 8 (Ka) is amended and as one time measure, preliminary test shall be at par with Teachers Eligibility Test (TET). Therefore, even after notification dated 14.5.2011, the Rule 8 (Ka) remained as it is and even the government also understood, so which is clear from advertisement dated 24-25.5.2011 wherein even after notification dated 14.5.2011, in the advertisement dated 24-25.5.2011 it is again declared that there shall be main examination after this preliminary cum TET (test). It appears that state issued notification and passed one after another order, that too after expiry of last date for submitting applications under the original advertisement but neither marking pattern has been changed in the Rules of 2002 nor Rules of 2002 have been amended to make the examination in question as final selection and appointment examination. Therefore, the examination and declaration of results on the basis of preliminary examination is illegal being contrary to Rule 8 (ka) of Rules of 2002.

19. None of the any persons in the state had knowledge that the State is going to conduct TET, therefore, any person who was aspirant for Teachers Eligibility Test had no opportunity to apply for this test. Even the persons who applied under impugned advertisement had no knowledge that they are applying for TET cum preliminary Teachers Selection Test. It appears that State had impression that, since they have power to issue order as well as right to enact, therefore, the State can do anything, can pass any order or amend Rules any time and in any manner and that too, not only after inviting applications under specific rules for appointment of teachers but even after last date for submitting the application can change the entire process as well purpose for which such applications invited. This is, therefore, glaring example of colurable exercise of power which amounts to malafide in law as it has deprived all candidates from competing on the basis of marks prescribed not only in the advertisement but as prescribed in the Rules of 2002 and denied opportunity to all eligible candidates to apply for Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) from entire State of Jharkhand and which is 
sought to be converted into from eligibility test to test for appointment.

20. The contention of the State is that the amendment and specifically the amendment made in the marking pattern and subjects vide advertisement dated 25.05.2011 were made because of the reason that on 26.04.2011 i.e., after publication of the advertisement on 26.03.2011, they came to know that it is mandatory condition prescribed by the NCTE that appointment on the post of teacher can be given only to those persons who possess the TET certificate and since it came to their knowledge only in April, 2011, they decided to prescribe all the norms of TET in the same process of selection and appointment so as to avoid further delay in the matter of appointment on the post of teachers in the State of Jharkhand for primary level schools. However, we are of the considered opinion that the plea taken by the State appears to be, if not false, it is wrong, because of the reason that the condition of having TET certificate as mandatory condition for appointment on the post of teacher was prescribed by the NCTE much earlier, on 23.08.2010 and not in the year 2011. Faced with this situation, learned counsel for the State submitted that though notification was issued on 23.08.2010 (Annexure- B submitted along with the supplementary counter affidavit by the State itself) but no guidelines were issued under the said notification and, therefore, the TET could not have been conducted.
The plea taken by the State is no justification for State's action rather, if it is so, then it is more serious matter. If the State had knowingly, and in fact had knowledge that State cannot give appointment to teacher without qualifying TET then the State should not have proceeded to invite applications of the candidates from entire State of Jharkhand. The stand of the State is self contradictory as well as cannot be said to be justified stand. It is not expected from any State that even after knowing mandatory condition, they will invite large number of public from the entire State of Jharkhand by projecting that incumbent will get appointment on the post of teacher. If the State was sure that it cannot give any appointment till the guidelines are issued by the competent authority, how the State could have issued the advertisement for appointment in violation to the NCTE guidelines when the NCTE duly notified and published in the Gazette dated 23.8.2010 and made it mandatory to give appointment on the post of teacher who passes TET, has not been explained by the State in any manner. The State also has no answer that if the guidelines would not have come even for another 1 - 2 years, then what would have happened to this process which they have started ?

20. Be that as it may be, the State's plea that the State could know about the guidelines of the NCTE dated 11.02.2011 only on 06.04.2011, we are believing only because of the fact that the State is stating so, and
therefore, we are believing. If it is true then, not much time was passed to advertisement dated 26.3.2011 no last date for applying passed then the State should have immediately withdrawn this advertisement dated 26.3.2011 and should have proceeded to conduct fresh test for TET certificate and if wished to take combined test, should have first amended the rules as one time measure and should have given fresh opportunity to all the eligible person in the State of Jharkhand to apply. At this juncture, we may again observe that marking pattern and papers given in the Advertisement No. 46 of 2011 are contrary to rules which are in force even today as Rule 8 (Ka) has not been amended by notification dated 14.5.2011 or for marks or for making it one examination for appointment. Furthermore, the last date for submitting the applications for selection on the post of such teachers was 15.04.2011 and decision to convert this selection process into a certificate process cum selection process was taken after 15th April, 2011 and all the candidates who would have aspirants for obtaining the certificate of the TET stand deprived from applying in this process. The person who were knowing well that only a candidate who possesses the TET certificate could have been given appointment, may not have applied for his selection in the process started by the advertisement dated 26.03.2011. We could not find out any of the justifications from any of the arguments or submissions made by the State that if a decision was taken to convert this selection process into certification process cum appointment process then why opportunity was not granted to all so as to make the competition wider.

22. It is also not in dispute that under the guidelines of NCTE, it is provided under Clause (9) that qualifying the TET would not confer a right on any person for recruitment/employment as it is only one of the eligibility criteria for appointment. Therefore, the TET itself cannot create a right to appointment. If the State had any intention to declare that a TET certificate holder shall be appointed then it should also have been known to everybody before advertising the post and at least before last date fixed in advertisement so that the candidates could have availed this opportunity. Not only this, as per the provision made under Clause 10, a TET certificate holder who obtains such certificate from any State/Union Territory then the other states may decide not to conduct a TET and can give appointment to the TET certificate holder in another State. Not only this, from the scheme of the TET, it is clear that it is not dependent upon the number of seats and a TET certificate can be given to any number of persons irrespective of the availability of the post because of the reason that it is just an eligibility test creating no right to appointment and in this situation even the number of posts as advertised in advertisement no. 27 of 2011 dated 26.03.2011 were absolutely irrelevant and this also may not have caused confusion in the minds of many persons who may have not applied by treating that there are number of limited posts available in each of the districts which has been disclosed in the advertisement.

23. Now what more has been done is that subjects have been changed and the subject of Mathematics has been included in the test which was not in the advertisement dated 26.03.2011, The subject of Child Development and Education was also not in the advertisement dated 26.03.2011. Inclusion of these subjects may also have changed the scope of competition by more applicants who may be good students of Mathematics as paper of 30 marks has been given for this subject.

24. The core question is that whether all the above could have been changed from the original process of selection and appointment started vide notification dated 26.03.2011? For this we take help from the judgement cited by the learned counsel for the State itself i.e., State of Bihar and Others Vs. Mithilesh Kumar reported in (2010) 13 SCC 467 wherein after considering various judgements of the Supreme Court, Hon'ble Supreme Court held that "we all say in one voice that the norms and rules as existing on the dates when the process of selection begins will control such selection and any alteration to such norms would not affect the continuing 22

process." Learned counsel for the State submitted that this proposition has been clarified by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in this very judgment by making it clear that "unless specifically the same (amendment in rules) were given retrospective effect." Here in this case, the clarification which has been relied upon by the learned counsel for the State has no application inasmuch as it has not been shown that any of the Rule has been made applicable retrospectively so as to make this selection process guided by any retrospectively operative Rules or retrospective amendment of the Rules. Rather say, the judgement only applies to the extent that the process of selection is required to be controlled and governed by the Rules which were existing at the time of start of selection process. We find support to our view from the judgement of the Hon'ble Supreme Court delivered in the case of Madan Mohan Sharma & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. reported in (2008) 3 SCC 724. In the said case, after holding that the subsequent amendment of the rules which was prospective, cannot be made retrospective so as to make the selection on the basis of the rules which were subsequently amended. The Hon'ble Supreme Court held that, if this was to be done then the only course left open was to recall the advertisement and issue fresh advertisement according to the Rules which had come into force. In the case of Sonia Vs. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. & Ors. reported in (2007) 10 SCC 627 and in 23

yet another judgment delivered in the case of N.T. Devin Katti & Ors. Vs. Karnataka Public Service Commission & Ors. reported in (1990) 3 SCC 157, it has been observed that where selection process has been initiated by issuing an advertisement inviting applications selection should normally be regulated by the Rule or Order then prevailing and also when advertisement expressly states that appointment shall be made in accordance with the existing Rule or Orders, subsequent amendment in the existing Rule or Order will not affect the pending selection process unless contrary intention is expressly or impliedly indicated. A similar view has been taken in the case of Hemani Malhotra Vs. High Court of Delhi reported in (2008) 7 SCC 11, in the case of Rakhi Ray & Ors. Vs. High Court of Delhi & Others reported in (2010) 2 SCC 637.

25. Not only this, the question papers have been changed, marking pattern has been changed, criteria for selection and requirement of obtaining minimum marks have also been changed, furthermore, a communication has been sent on 11.10.2011 by the Principal Secretary, Human Resources and Development Department of the State to Chair-person, Jharkhand Academic Council, conveying that the State Government has, by this decision, decided that the candidates selected in preliminary test shall be entitled to appointment and he will not have to face the main examination as notified in the original advertisement and required by Rules of 2002. Therefore, by this change, the preliminary test has been converted, not only into final test but created a right to appointment on the post. In this situation, the argument of learned counsel Sri R. Krishna that preliminary test or TET is not selection process for appointment cannot survive. At this juncture, it will be worthwhile to mention here that a person could have succeeded in preliminary examination if he would have obtained a lower marks i.e., 35% of 30% marks in the language subjects but without amending rules, all those who may have got these marks have been deprived to appear in the final examination as the persons who secured marks less than 60 % have been declared failed. Therefore, a stringent criteria has also been prescribed.

26. Learned counsel for the State submitted that the State has not yet taken any decision (though copy of the communication dated 11.10.2011 is on record) because, for taking such decision, the Rule will require to be amended and today the State is not in a position to give any appointment to successful candidates because the Rule has not been amended to dispense with the main examination. Then in fact, as per law existing today, the State has no right to give any appointment even to the candidates who have been declared successful in the examination because of the plain and simple reason that the successful candidates faced the examination only 
under the advertisement dated 26.03.2011, then they can be only successful candidates for preliminary and not for main examination but at the same time the examination were not in accordance with rules or as per the advertisement dt. 26.3.2011, therefore, the successful candidates cannot be declared successful candidates even for preliminary test for Teachers appointment. It appears that the State took the decisions time to time and thereafter, tried to become wise and issued various notices and advertisements which is apparent from the fact that in spite of having condition of TET for appointment on the post of teachers, the State proceeded to advertise huge number of vacancies running in about 18,000 and invited applications of 1,31,000 candidates from entire State. Then State became wise when it received the guidelines on 06.04.2011 and issued another notice instead of withdrawing the process of selection itself and tried to make the conditions of original appointment in consonance with the guidelines issued by the NCTE. At that time also, there was no decision that the candidates who will appear in this combined or common test for TET and for selection and appointment shall not have to go for main examination and then on 11.10.2011 it has been conveyed to the Jharkhand Academic Council that the State (without amending the Rules of 2002) has taken decision to give appointment to such selected candidates directly on the post without
there being completion or having the main examination and now the State's stand is that such decision has not yet attained finality and not became the part of the Rule. Therefore, till today nobody knows how these selected candidates will be dealt with and these selected candidates are under illusion that they are about to get the appointment order whereas, the candidates who were declared successful were not successful candidates either under rules which are in existence today nor as per advertisement conditions.

27. In view of the above reasons, we found from the facts of the case that nothing survives in the advertisement dated 26.03.2011 in view of the subsequent acts and actions of the State Government except misleading the all candidates who appeared in the examination which is said to be 1,31,000 in numbers.

28. We tried to explore the possibility of saving the interest of the candidates who secured good marks in the examination but it is difficult in view of the fact that the examination itself was contrary to Rules. Process of selection which should be transparent, known to all and thereafter there must be a fair competition which, in the facts of the case, is totally missing and therefore, we have no option but to declare the entire process taken after the issuance of advertisement dated 26.03.2011, to be absolutely illegal, null and void.

29. In addition to above, other points which have 27

been raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner in the writ petition with respect to prescribing of minimum marks for tribal and regional language for particular district and requiring of obtaining minimum marks are concerned, we are not deciding these issues in view of quashing of entire selections. Accordingly, the writ petition of the petitioner is allowed and consequently the Advertisement dated 26.03.2011 and entire process of selection undertaken under this advertisement is quashed. We also do not find any force in the submission of learned Additional Advocate General that issues raised are beyond the scope of writ because of the reason the petitioner has placed on record all relevant facts and more important is glaring illegalities are apparent from the face of the record placed by the State and the Academic Council of the State and the State got full opportunity to justify their own stand and this Court cannot ignore these illegalities. However, it is expected from the State Government to now proceed for appointment of the teachers de-novo by following the guidelines issued by the NCTE and in accordance with the Rules for appointment as the NCTE has only prescribed the eligibility criteria, passing of the TET whereas, the prescribing procedure for appointment on the post is the prerogative of the State and is in its jurisdiction, therefore, the procedure may be evolved by the State Government so as to avoid further delay in the 28

matter. The session for schools will start from the month of July, 2012, therefore, before that, all appointment can be made by the State Government before next session.

30. The writ petition is allowed as above. In view of the fact that entire process of selection and the advertisement dated 26.03.2011 have been quashed and set aside, therefore, writ petitions being W.P.(PIL) No. 6495 of 2011 and W.P.(S) No. 6592 are also disposed of with observation that before taking any decision all issues which have been raised in this petition and in W.P. (PIL) No. 6495 and in W.P. (S) No. 6592 of 2011 may also be considered and if the State finds more corrections and amendments in the rules are required they may be made in accordance with law, if needed only.

31. No order as to costs.

(Prakash Tatia, C J)

(P.P. Bhatt, J)

100 comments:

HANUMAN JI TET 66% BUT ACD SUPPOTER said...

Jao mere bhaiyo jao lekin bach ke 12 july kuch nahi hone wala hai.
JAI SRI RAM
ALL IS WELL
BOLO HANUMAN JI KI JAI.

Anand tiwari said...

abi haal hi me news paper me aaya tha 27000 logo
ke omr pr fluid ink laga kr dhaandhali ki gai.bt abi
ssc ne fluid ke use ko manya kr diya
kyonki ink ko mitaya to ja nai sakta link dekhe http://sscnr.net.in/newlook/site/index.aspx

Anand tiwari said...

@ muskan mam ,,,
Upar ke link se news ko blog pe dale.
Thanks.

santosh Gaur said...

Plz anyone describe above

Anand tiwari said...

isme process change kiya gaya tha jharkhand govt. Ke dwara.
Lekin bachche court gaye aur waha se unhe nyay mila...

Arpan said...

http://sscnr.net.in/newlook/site/index.aspx
RESULT/NOMINATION OF VARIOUS SELECTION POSTS DURING JUNE, 2012

IT HAS COME TO THE NOTICE OF COMMISSION THAT SOMETIMES THE CANDIDATES DESIRE TO ALTER/ CORRECT THE ANSWERS ALREADY RECORDED ON OMR ANSWER SHEET BY FILLING IN OR DARKENING THE RECTANGLE/ OVAL ON OMR SHEET BY BLUE OR BLACK PEN. THE COMMISSION HAS DECIDED THAT CORRECTING FLUID MAY BE ALLOWED IN THE EXAMINATION HALL FOR THIS PURPOSE.

Shakeel Ahmad said...

....

SANTOSH MAURYA said...

a

himanshu singh said...

Anand yr tumne to puri jankari de di ki 27000 log is dhandhali me shamil hai
to yahi log hai blog pr

SANTOSH MAURYA said...

12 julai lkw chlo

SANTOSH MAURYA said...

भाईयो 12 जुलाई को लखनऊ चलो: निकाय चुनाव मे अखिलेश की हालत खराब है और यही मौका है सरकार पर दबाव बनाने का ॥

RAJU RAJPOOT said...

Kuch nahi hoga phale ladhiya padi thi.koi nahi jayga.

Anand tiwari said...

aur santosh bhai kaise ho,,,
Is bar time se nikal jana nahi to fir railway station pe hi bhatakte rahoge...

SANTOSH MAURYA said...

भाईयो 12 जुलाई को लखनऊ चलो: सभी को अपने माँ-बाप की कसम टीईटी मेरिट जिन्दाबाद ॥

RAJU RAJPOOT said...

DINESH RAJPOOT SALE GALI DETA H.MERE TO KOI SISTER NAHI H.MAGAR TARI TO BHAN H.TO CHAL ME TARA JIJA JI LAGA TU MERA SALA HO GYA PAKA wala.ek bar jija kh maaf kar duga.

RAJU RAJPOOT said...

EK BATT SABHI SUNLO KAN KHOLKAR KI ACD. Jindabad thi,HAI,OR RAHEGI/

moh. istyak said...

sathiyon 12 july lucknow chalo rampur se kam se kam 400 tetians ,lucknow pahuch rahe hain.moh.istyak rampur

RAJU RAJPOOT said...

Agar ap log blog par gali ka pryog karoge to jija tumhe free me milega.DINESH RAJPOOT NE TO MUJHE JIJA KAH DIYA H.KYOKI EK HI CAST KE HAI.KYO BE SALE SAHI KH RHA HU.

Unknown said...

Anand tiwari ji, ssc ka yah apna statement hai ki fluid use kiya jaye.but uptet ki omr k instructions me clear likha tha ki fluid ka use na kiya jaye so jisne kiya hai wo 100% bahar hoga.

ashish said...

dosto lucknow aandolan ke parti tetians mai gajab ka utsah hai.gov ke dar ki parvah na karte hue anek tetians apne haq ke liye lucknow ke liye taiyar hain sabhi jagah se bahut hi havey response hai.log dekhege 12 ko lucknow mai poora lucknow tetians se bhara hoga.dosto hum sachchai aur nayay ke liye lad rahe hain god hamare sath hai.sabhi jilo se jaisi news aa rahi hain tetians mai 12 ko lekar bahut hi jyada utsukta hai. virodhiyo ki sath bahas mat kijiye inki sankhya ungliyo par ginne layak hai.alag alag mail id banakar gharo mai baithkar ye hi muskil se 10 log acd jindabad ki mala japte rahte hain inki bato par plz no comment.ashish rajvanshi mzn tet sangharsh morcha jindabad

ashish said...

dosto 12 ko lucknow mai hi primary schools mai apng aur nisakt bachcho ko shikshit karne wale vishesh shikshako ka sammelan hai jisme basic shiksha manti sri ram govind chowdhri ji mukhya atithi honge isliye yahi mauka hai matri ji bhi us din lucknow mai hamari sankhya ko dekh lenge aur gov. hamare bare mai sochegi.ashish rajvanshi tet sangharsh morcha jindabad

somesh shekhawat said...

yaro in sab bato ko chodkar kuch rasta nikalo .varna tet bharti latak jayegi sab thage se rah jayege. Kisi ke hath kuch nahi lagega.

shiv kumar parmar said...

two truth concepts for all tetians , if they want prt job
1.Agar sarkar 6august ko acd merit se bharti ka afidevit deti h to acd merit supporter that time kuch samay k liye kush ho jayenge, lekin iske vipreet according to old advertisement sirf ek tet supporter k dwara court m writ lagane se bharti akhilesh k shesh karykal tak latak sakti h , jo ki sarkar chahti h.
2.Agar sarkar 6 august ko tet merit se bharti karne ka afdevit deti h to vh old advertisement k according to hogi, aur jiske according to hee hum sb logo ne apply kiya h, ab agar acd. merit supporter tet merit k against court m writ dete h to according to old adv. unki writ ka koi adhar nahi hoga

somesh shekhawat said...

u r right.

somesh shekhawat said...

sathio 12 july ko mahan andolan ka bigul baj chuka he .jyada se 2 sankya me ane ke liye apana farz samajhe? 1857 ke bad ye dosara mahan andolan hoga. Jay tet jay bharat.

somesh shekhawat said...

high disital vedio app jarur laye jisake pas ableble ho vo jarur aye. tet sanghash morcha aligarh. AMU TET MORCHA 2011 JINDABAD

R.S.YADAV said...

HI,

IF THE UP GOVT IS GOING TO DO THE PROCESS OF UP PRIMARY TEACHER ON ACADEMIC THEN WE SHOULD RESPECT THEIR DECISION BECAUSE IF WE ALL TET CANDIDATES WILL DEMAND ACCORDING TO OUR CONVENIENCE THEN THE RECRUITMENT CAN BE CANCELED. THE GOVT IS UNDERSTANDING THAT IN THE MAYAVATI'S GOVT IT'S HAPPEN A BIG GHOTALA THEN WHY MERIT ON TET BASIC BECAUSE THE PERSON WHO HAS GIVEN 4-5 LACS FOR GOOD MARKS SO THEY ARE CRYING FOR DHARNA .SO THE BEST WAY FOR SELECTION IS ACADEMIC MERIT

THANKS
R.S.YADAV
9899847119

Anil TET said...

SP govt havs solid reason to cancel TET or to change the base of. requirement so please demand to cancel TET ,

Anil TET said...

TET ke failed candidates Aur academic supporter se request hai ke Uptet 2011 ko cancel karne ke mang kare on the ground TET me hue aanimitha or irregularities ke karan , reason ya TET merit wale Kuch Jyade he uchal rahe aur inke leader muskan v.
to please academic supporter Aur TET failed Mil kr TET ko cancel Karwa a Aur New TET ke mang kare ,

Jitendra Chaudhary said...

Chaudhary:-12 july ko jyada se jyada tet candidate lucknow pahuchin

Anil TET said...

academic supporter ape log Apne leaders se andolan Aur pradershan karne ke mang kare on ke TET academic merit. se process start kare ,

Anil TET said...

akhilash yadav 11 Aur 12 July ko Delhi me rahane ga , because prime minister ne special invitation. bhaja hai up govt ko sources today Sahara samay

Anil TET said...

TET ke failed candidates Aur academic supporter se request hai ke Uptet 2011 ko cancel karne ke mang kare on the ground TET me hue aanimitha or irregularities ke karan , reason ya TET merit wale Kuch Jyade he uchal rahe aur inke leader muskan v.
to please academic supporter Aur TET failed Mil kr TET ko cancel Karwa a Aur New TET ke mang kare ,

THAKUR R.V.SINGH DAMANPUR said...

R.V.SINGH said...
A bad news for tet rankers and good news for academic rank
up government is doing too high work to change process of selection with justice department and e.m says that we will get earlysuccess .today news expressCDMERIT JINDABAD ACDMERIT JINDABAD ACDMERIT JINDABAD ACDMERIT JINDABAD ACDMERIT JINDABAD ACDMERIT JINDABAD ACDMERIT JINDABAD ACDMERIT JINDABAD ACDMERIT JINDABAD ACDMERIT JINDABAD ACDMERIT JINDABAD ACDMERIT JINDABAD ACDMERIT JINDABAD ACDMERIT JINDABAD ACDMERIT JINDABAD ACDMERIT JINDABAD ACDMERIT JINDABAD ACDMERIT JINDABAD ACDMERIT JINDABAD ACDMERIT JINDABAD ACDMERIT JINDABAD ACDMERIT JINDABAD ACDMERIT JINDABAD ACDMERIT JINDABAD ACDMERIT JINDABAD ACDMERIT JINDABAD ACDMERIT JINDABAD ACDMERIT JINDABAD ACDMERIT JINDABAD ACDMERIT JINDABAD ACDMERIT JINDABAD ACDMERIT JINDABAD ACDMERIT JINDABAD ACDMERIT JINDABAD ACDMERIT JINDABAD ACDMERIT JINDABAD ACDMERIT JINDABAD ACDMERIT JINDABAD ACDMERIT JINDABAD ACDMERIT JINDABAD ACDMERIT JINDABAD ACDMERIT JINDABAD ACDMERIT JINDABAD ACDMERIT JINDABAD ACDMERIT JINDABAD ACDMERIT JINDABAD ACDMERIT JINDABAD ACDMERIT JINDABAD ACDMERIT JINDABAD

Anil TET said...

Ab to challenge ke bate hai -TET merit se vacancy process start hone he Nahi denga , Chai Sc me another party he Kyo ne banane pade,
Waise v academic merit walo bigoted ne kare
govt ne to Apne kam kar he liya hai bas HP commit ke rules par signature hone bake hai jo July ke last week me ho jai ga Aur karu week me he New advertisement v aye. ga .wait and watch ,

Anil TET said...

govt ke pass kewal do he option hai -
1. TET academic merit se vacancy ho ya
2.TET cancel ho ,
HC ko govt ke bate manane he hai Kyo ke case to govt ke favour me strong hai !

vivek kumar said...

1.77 lak pado par tet valo ki bharti mantri
ka vedhan sabha mein bayan hai

Anil TET said...

frend Yaha to ape ko v pate hai ke blog par hum Apne Koi v opinion do govt ko Ise sa Koi Matlab Nahi hai . govt ko Jo karne hai wo Wahi kare ge ,

himanshu singh said...

Ye log mang kare tet merit ki
AUR
hm log mang kare tet cancil ki

CHALO 12 JULY KO LUCKNOW CHALO
ACDM.WALO

6AUGAST KA INTAZAR NAHI KAREGE

Anand tiwari said...

Mushkil Raahe Bhi Aasan Ho Jati Hai,
Har Rah Par Pehchan Ho Jaati Hai,
Jo Log Muskura Ke Karte Hai Saamna,
Kismat Unki Gulaam Ho Jaati Hai..

12 ko LKW me jarurr apne liye aye...

Anil TET said...

Kisi K Deedar Mei Tadapta Hai Yeh Dil,

Kisi K Intezar Mei Tarasta Hai Yeh Dil,

Kya Kamaal Ka Hai Yeh Dil,

Khud Apna Ho Kar Bhi

Kisi Aur Ke Liye Dhadakta Hai Yeh Dil

himanshu singh said...

Jo log kismat ke bhrose baithte hai
unko utna hi milta hai jitna mehnat karne wale chor dete hai

santosh Gaur said...

Beta new tet me 6 to 8 k liye jhk marna 1to5 me apply ka b mauka nhi milega chutiye

somesh shekhawat said...

tet meri jindabad mere tet mai 119 acd 273 par me tet merit supp. Ho

somesh shekhawat said...

tet merit se bharti jaldi hogi ar acd se ye bhari nahi hogi kyo ki sarkar ko hc ki jaldi fatakar lagane wali he. From -arun tandana judge high court allahabad sorce of times of india

somesh shekhawat said...

ha ha

DINESH RAJPUT said...

RAJU RAJCHOOT MAIRA JIJA HAI JISKI MAINE MA BAHAN EK KAR RAKHI HAI

DINESH RAJPUT said...

RAJU
RAJU
RAJU
RAJU
RAJU
RAJU



BHOOTNI KE LE MAZE .... NA AA RHE HO TO MUHH KHOL KE RAKHIYO ME AA RHA HU

DINESH RAJPUT said...

YOU ARE RIGHT Mr, SOMESH

IN ACDEMIC WAALO KO SAALO KO BINA PITE BAAT SAMAJH ME NHI AATI

ram said...

himanshu singh, tum bevakoof ho. tet walo ki nakal kar rahe ho. gaanv se exam dekar merit bana liye ho. Tet wale hi eligible hain teaching ke liye aur koi nahi

DINESH RAJPUT said...

IN SAALO KO MAI HI THIK KAR WOWNGA AGRA KE MENTAL HOSPITAL ME

DINESH RAJPUT said...

YOU RIGHT Mr RAM JI


AAP KE VICHAR BILKUL AAPKE NAAM JAISE HAI



EK HANUMAN NAAM KA NAKALCHI BANDAR HAI JISKO APNA NAAM KA SHI ARTH NHI PTA


YE KUTTA PITEGA

DINESH RAJPUT said...

HANUMAN
HANUMAN
HANUMAN
HANUMAN
HANUMAN
HANUMAN
HANUMAN



TU TP GYA TERA MAINE ADRESS NIKAL WA LIYA HAI AB TU DEKH TUJHE MAI KAISE PHASATA HU

BUS TU 2 ,4 DIN RUK TUJHE MAI BATATA HU KI KOH HU OR MAI KYA KAR SAKTA HU

deepak kumar said...

hanuman aaj to tuesday h. aaj ke din to kam se kam sach bolta tet me 66% aur acd. me kitne h ye nahi batayenga.

deepak kumar said...

himachal me teacher ki bharti tet ki merit se ho rahi h yakeen nahi aata to neeche likhe link per dekh lo

http://himachal.nic.in/eleedu/tgtcouncellingontetbasis_a1b.pdf

Unknown said...

PRATHVIRAJ CHARKHARI
Mr. Anand tiwari please contact me my number is 9198506560

savita pandey said...

12July Ko pahucho hum sab phuch rahe hain Lucknow.

HANUMAN JI TET 66% BUT ACD SUPPOTER said...

ab ye blog kuch log milkar ganda kar rahe hai.
enko jab apne sanskar he bhool gaye hai.
abhadr bhasa ka parog jab ye bhagwan ke nam ke sath kar rahe hai to ye apne parents ke sath kaya bhawar karenge.
kuch log mera acd janna chahte hai to jan le 256/male art/sc hai
are tet merit ka mala japne walo apne 16 saal ka back ground dekho agar yah nahi hota to tet kaya kisi bhi exm me nahi baith paate
yah blog hai har koi apna mat de raha mujhe to kisi ke mat se koi problem nahi hai to TUM LOGO kayo ho raha hai AT LAST KOI KUCH BHI KARLE BHARTI TO C M KE ANUSAR HOGA AB TUM LOG SOCHO,TUM KUCH NAHI KAR PAOGE MERA KAYA MERA DONO BASE PAR HOGA AGAR ROK SAKTE HO TO ROK LO APNE KO JHANKHO JAI BAJRANG BALI ALL IS WELL BOLO HANUMAN JI KI JAI

HANUMAN JI TET 66% BUT ACD SUPPOTER said...

ab ye blog kuch log milkar ganda kar rahe hai.
enko jab apne sanskar he bhool gaye hai.
abhadr bhasa ka parog jab ye bhagwan ke nam ke sath kar rahe hai to ye apne parents ke sath kaya bhawar karenge.
kuch log mera acd janna chahte hai to jan le 256/male art/sc hai
are tet merit ka mala japne walo apne 16 saal ka back ground dekho agar yah nahi hota to tet kaya kisi bhi exm me nahi baith paate
yah blog hai har koi apna mat de raha mujhe to kisi ke mat se koi problem nahi hai to TUM LOGO kayo ho raha hai AT LAST KOI KUCH BHI KARLE BHARTI TO C M KE ANUSAR HOGA AB TUM LOG SOCHO,TUM KUCH NAHI KAR PAOGE MERA KAYA MERA DONO BASE PAR HOGA AGAR ROK SAKTE HO TO ROK LO APNE KO JHANKHO JAI BAJRANG BALI ALL IS WELL BOLO HANUMAN JI KI JAI

himanshu singh said...

In logo ka coment parne se to aisa lag raha hai ki tet radd ki khabar sunkar bokhla gaye hai
Bhiyo inko nukri chaye
vo bhi jabarjasti
aur mehanat kro
novmbar me tet hai
mehanat kro aur fir 130 avb. lao
hmlogo ko to fir sirf pass hona hai

raj said...

jai hanuman!

Dr.Amit Agrahari TETPASS MAHARAJGANJ 9452061561 said...

sathio abhi abhi suchna mili hai ki gov. tet merit se bharti karne ja rahi hai is vacance ke alawa 80000 ki vacance ki vigyapan nikalne wali hai aap log na lade balki jasn manaye kyoki manjil ab samne hai aish kare by

Anand tiwari said...

bhai amit ji aap kya chah rahe hai ...
Aapse maine kai bar bat ki hai aap mujhe jimmedar vyakti lage...

Aur ab aap aisi bate kar rahe hai...

Amit Agrawal said...

Ek bat yaha samajhne wali h ki agar bharti tet merit se hoti h to isme sabi tet pas candidats ke chayan ki kuch na kuch posibility hogi. Aur agali bharti ke liye rasta khul jayega jisme acd ya tet ke base par bharti hogi jisme sabka bhala hoga. Dusri bat agar ye bharti acd se ho to nischit hi s.c. Me case jayega aur ye bharti latak jayegi. Sahi bat dusri bharti ki wo pahli bharti ke na hone par ni ho sakti matlab sabko nuksan.
Amit007

Amit Agrawal said...

Ek bat yaha samajhne wali h ki agar bharti tet merit se hoti h to isme sabi tet pas candidats ke chayan ki kuch na kuch posibility hogi. Aur agali bharti ke liye rasta khul jayega jisme acd ya tet ke base par bharti hogi jisme sabka bhala hoga. Dusri bat agar ye bharti acd se ho to nischit hi s.c. Me case jayega aur ye bharti latak jayegi. Sahi bat dusri bharti ki wo pahli bharti ke na hone par ni ho sakti matlab sabko nuksan.
Amit007

Ramesh said...

Dr. Amit Agrahari ji TET merit se selection wali suchna apna personal shoch hai ya kahi par sahi suchna mili hai.

sandip shukla said...

yar sab bate bhul kar 12 ko lko aao
nischay kar ke ki abki keval lathi nahi khana hai

sandip shukla said...

yar sp government purvagrah se gradsit hai aise aasani se nahi manegi

sandip shukla said...

yar cm australia me hai kaun nirnay kr liya ......................wo raddi power comittee

sandip shukla said...

cm akhilesh ji 11 july ko australia se vapas aa rahe hai uske bad 12 ko nirnay kar sakte hai jab aap log lucknow aayen

Saleem said...

Me ishtyak ke bare me janna chahta hun jo rampur ka hone ka dawa kar rahe he

Saleem said...

Sathiyo hum sachchai ke wal par jitenge jhuth na likhe
tet zindabad

Shabbir hussain said...

Dosto 12 july ko harhaal me lucknow chalna h.

Dr.Amit Agrahari TETPASS MAHARAJGANJ 9452061561 said...

mere pyare bhaiyo aur bahno kya maine koi galti ki sahi suchna deke aap log aapas mai lad rahe hai ye achi bat nahi hai ab to clear hai 1 lakh 52 hazar job tet merit se bhare jayenge iski 100% guranti hai plz enjoy

Shabbir hussain said...

Dosto yeh hamari jung ki last stage h agar ab peechhe hate to pata n kitni jung aur karni pade.age aao isbaar hamari( tet merit) jeet pakki h.

ashish said...

dosto agar ye bharti 72000 ke bajay 1000 pado ke liye hoti to sochiye jara ye acd ki mang karne wale tab bhi iski mang karte.ya compitition ka samna karna pasand karte.kuch log kahte hain ki kewal ek exam ke bal par bharti karna theek nahi hai to dosto sabhi bhartiyon mai ek hi compitition exam clear karke job mil jati hai.isliye sachchai ka sath den. ashish rajvanshi jay compitition tet sangharsh morcha jindabad

Dr.Amit Agrahari TETPASS MAHARAJGANJ 9452061561 said...

PRIY TET BHAIYO AUR BAHNO HMAI ABKI BAR BADI SANKHYA MAI 12 JULY KO LUCKHNOW JAKAR GOV. SE APNE HAQ KI MANG KARNI HAI AAP SAB JYADA SE JYADA SANKHYA MAI PAHUNCH KE GOV. KO APNI SAKTI DIKHAYE JIS SE GOV. APKE SATH NAINSAFI NA KAR SKE TO CHALE 12 JULY LUCKHNOW ANTIM BAR AUR CHIN KE LAYE APNA ADHIKAR

niks said...

yaar pls merit k aadharr ko lekr aapas me mat lado. is se hm log 2 grps acd aur tet merit me devide ho gaye hain.. is se hamara lose h.isliye aadar ke ladai chod kr sab unity banao aur sabhi tetians k liye job k maang rakho .pls..pls apne views de....

Dr.Amit Agrahari TETPASS MAHARAJGANJ 9452061561 said...

PRIY TET BHAIYO AUR BAHNO HMAI ABKI BAR BADI SANKHYA MAI 12 JULY KO LUCKHNOW JAKAR GOV. SE APNE HAQ KI MANG KARNI HAI AAP SAB JYADA SE JYADA SANKHYA MAI PAHUNCH KE GOV. KO APNI SAKTI DIKHAYE JIS SE GOV. APKE SATH NAINSAFI NA KAR SKE TO CHALE 12 JULY LUCKHNOW ANTIM BAR AUR CHIN KE LAYE APNA ADHIKAR

Shabbir hussain said...

Prt job ki root sirf tet merit.

niks said...

shabbir ji aap jaise he kuch logo k wajah se aaj hum 2 grps me bant chuke hai.. ek to tet merit doosra acd.merit..is se kisi ka bhala nahi hoga aapka b nahi..

Rajesh Kumar said...

Dost acd merit wale kam padhe likhe hain. Ye nahin samjhenge.

RAKESH said...

DOSTO MERE HISAB SE TET MAI ITANY DHADLI NAHI HUE JITNA KI TET KO BADNAM KIYA JARAHA HAI ISKI BADNAMI KE DO PAHLU HAI FAIL STUDENT CHATE HAI KI TET NIRAST HO JAE OUR HAI UNHE DUBARA SE CHANC MIL JAE

moh. istyak said...

tet sangharsh morche ka hai ye eailan,tet merit se karo bharti ya le lo jaan.12 july mahaandolan lkw chalo. moh. istyak rampur

Shabbir hussain said...

M ishtyaq u right.

ALOOK YADAV said...

Vigyavan radd ho gaya aur naya vigyapan acd merit base 6 august ko ayega.
Alok yadav kannauj

somesh shekhawat said...

rahane do mat feko

M.K.SHARMA, Mathura said...

Third front is ready for Graduation+B.ed+TET

Rajesh Kumar said...

Apni wishes ko news banana chaahate ho. ACHA HAI.

Rajesh Kumar said...

Acd merit walon ke liye acha mauka. UPSC ki ghosna agla IAS batch acd merit se.

M.K.SHARMA, Mathura said...

Sab log jashn mana rahe hai to lko kaun jayega.
152000 ki guaranty tumne li hai.

Rajesh Kumar said...

mera to dono raasto se 100% ho jayega. Par mein sach aur nyay ke saath hoon. Yani TET jindabad.

sanjeev said...

mere academic supporter friends mai apki taklif samajh raha hu tum apni jagah thilk ho aur hum apni jagah .yaha par tet tet academic academic chillane se kuch mahi hoga .yadi beech mei process change hota h to mai s c tak lekar jauga aur ye bat tvm bhi jante ho aur mai bhi ki vigyapam mai diye gaye sarto ke anupar kiska paksh strong h .ab s c dwra liya gaya decision manya hoga .is matter par ab bekar ki bahas kane se kni fayada nahi .aplog apma jor laga chuke h ab hamari bari h .

sanjeev said...

dushya g where are you sir please come

Rajpal yadav said...

wah re sajeev babo i am with you

SAURABH PRADEEP said...

Acd merit walo k liye good news ab sarkar 5th aur 8th ka no. Bhi add kar acd merit banai jayegi! Aur app acd bhaiyo ko padane ki jimmedariyo se mukat kiya jayega aur aap logo k upar vidhayal k saaf safai ki jimmedari di jayegi kyoki sarkar bi aap logo se primarmy vidhalay ke bachho ko nai padwana chahti! Ab acd bhai log aap kya banana pasand kare techer ki safai karmi? Safai to dono jagah karni h.

SAURABH PRADEEP said...

Acd merit walo k liye good news ab sarkar 5th aur 8th ka no. Bhi add kar acd merit banai jayegi! Aur app acd bhaiyo ko padane ki jimmedariyo se mukat kiya jayega aur aap logo k upar vidhayal k saaf safai ki jimmedari di jayegi kyoki sarkar bi aap logo se primarmy vidhalay ke bachho ko nai padwana chahti! Ab acd bhai log aap kya banana pasand kare techer ki safai karmi? Safai to dono jagah karni h.

SAURABH PRADEEP said...

Acd merit walo k liye good news ab sarkar 5th aur 8th ka no. Bhi add kar acd merit banai jayegi! Aur app acd bhaiyo ko padane ki jimmedariyo se mukat kiya jayega aur aap logo k upar vidhayal k saaf safai ki jimmedari di jayegi kyoki sarkar bi aap logo se primarmy vidhalay ke bachho ko nai padwana chahti! Ab acd bhai log aap kya banana pasand kare techer ki safai karmi? Safai to dono jagah karni h.

himanshu singh said...

Aur nahi hua to hm lejar jayge

R.S.YADAV said...

HI,

GOOD ALOK YADAV JI.
LAGE RAHO WE ARE WITH U