/* remove this */ Blogger Widgets /* remove this */

Friday, April 12, 2013

UPTET /Allahabad Highcourt/ Selection of Teachers in UP : Different University Marks Can Be used to Make Common Merit OR Not

UPTET  /Allahabad Highcourt/ Selection of Teachers in UP : Different University Marks Can Be used to Make Common Merit OR Not

अलग अलग यूनिवर्सिटी के मार्क्स की तुलना /मेरिट बनाना सही है या नहीं 


अदालत ने कहा की सरकार का कोई भी  पालिसी डिसीजन अगर अनुच्छेद 14 व 16 का उल्लंघन करता है 
तो अदालत उसका परीक्षण  कर सकती है 
अनुच्छेद 14 नागरिकों के समानता के नियम को प्रतिपादित करता है 
अदालत ने सरकार को काउंटर एफिडेविट लगाने के लिए २ हफ्ते का समय दिया है 

अगली सुनवाई 29 अप्रैल 2013 को निर्धारित की गयी है ,

देखिये अदालत की कार्यवाही -




HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

?Court No. - 33
Case :- SPECIAL APPEAL No. - 548 of 2013
Petitioner :- Arvind Kumar Shukla And 3 Ors.
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Ors.
Petitioner Counsel :- Anil Tiwari
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,Harendra Yadav

Hon'ble Sushil Harkauli,J.
Hon'ble Manoj Misra,J.
It has been argued from the side of the petitioner-appellant that although the examination has taken place but the result has not yet been declared because of the stay order continuing in some other case.
The Rule has been amended by the State.� Its authority is under challenge on the ground that the method of computation of quality point marks in respect of B.Ed. degree is illegal.� This method of computation, which is provided in the amended Rule namely Adding of the Marks obtained in Theory and Practical and thereafter calculating the percentage leads to discrimination between candidates who have passed their B.Ed. examination from different Universities, which allot different marks for theory and practical.
Therefore, Counter affidavit will examine this aspect as to whether the suggested method namely calculation of percentage of marks separately in theory and practical for B.Ed. adding� the two and dividing them by 2 would remove the discrimination alleged.
We are passing this order after going through� the decision of learned Single Judge of this Court dated 21.01.2008 passed in a Bunch of writ petitions headed by the writ petition no. 54049 of 2007 which was set aside in a Bunch of Special� Appeals headed by Special Appeal No. 166 of 2008 decided on 03.04.2008 in as much as apparently the appellate judgment did not consider the case of discrimination� with regard the candidates passing B.Ed. from different Universities, which have different marks for theory and practical.� Moreover, because in that case the Special Appellate Bench refused to interfere on the ground that it was a policy decision.� Whereas, prima facie, even� a� policy decision, which results in discrimination and thus, violates the fundamental right guaranteed under Articles 14 and 16 could be� examined by the writ Court and lastly the decision of the Special Appeal was� also based on consideration of the situation.� Here� the result has not been declared because of the interim order passed in another case, which gives ample time to the writ Court to take corrective measures so far as the discrimination alleged is concerned. 
Counter affidavit will be filed within two weeks. 
List in the week commencing 29.04.2013. 

���� (Manoj Misra,J.) (Sushil Harkauli,J.)
Order Date :- 11.4.2013/-MAA/-


Source : http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=2496206
***************************************

फ़िलहाल समस्त भारत में शिक्षक भर्ती के लिए अकादमिक अंको का भी वेटेज दिया जा रहा है , जैसे कि - गुजरात ,बिहार , एस एस ए चंडीगढ़ , एल टी ग्रेड शिक्षक भर्ती उत्तर प्रदेश , तमिलनाडु  इत्यादि 


12 comments:

  1. अदालत ने कहा की सरकार का कोई भी पालिसी डिसीजन अगर अनुच्छेद 14 व 16 का उल्लंघन करता है
    तो अदालत उसका परीक्षण कर सकती है
    अनुच्छेद 14 नागरिकों के समानता के नियम को प्रतिपादित करता है

    ReplyDelete
  2. EK BAHUT BADA MUDDA YE BHI HAI KI B.SC. ME PRACTICAL SUBJECT HOTE HAIN AUR B.A. ME JYADATAR NONE PRACTICAL FIR BHI DONO KI EK SAATH MERIT KAISE BANAEE JA SAKTI HAI

    ReplyDelete
  3. bhai shukla ji aap ko itna to maalum hi hoga ki B.sc aur B.A mein kya fark hai. baat itni hai ki hum is sachhai se muh mod rahe hain ki hum kitne kaabil hai. aur isme unn vidyarthyion ka kya kasur hai jinhone 10,12 aur graduation mein mehnat karke achchhe ank prapt kiye. agar kisi ko is baat ka itna hi bura lag raha hai ki academic marks kyun liye ja rahe hain, to meri yahi guzarish hai ki bhaiyon kitabon se judey rajneeti se nahi.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thakur shab TET Ka pape bh 1 se 8 tak ki kitabo se aaya tha.BA .B.Sc kafi upar ki bate hai...

      Delete
  4. bhai shukla ji aap ko itna to maalum hi hoga ki B.sc aur B.A mein kya fark hai. baat itni hai ki hum is sachhai se muh mod rahe hain ki hum kitne kaabil hai. aur isme unn vidyarthyion ka kya kasur hai jinhone 10,12 aur graduation mein mehnat karke achchhe ank prapt kiye. agar kisi ko is baat ka itna hi bura lag raha hai ki academic marks kyun liye ja rahe hain, to meri yahi guzarish hai ki bhaiyon kitabon se judey rajneeti se nahi.

    ReplyDelete
  5. H.s.+inter+b.a.+b.ed+experience = Comptetive exam( tet)

    ReplyDelete
  6. srajendra ji main aapki baat se sahmat hoon, kyunki yahi sahi tareeka hai pratishat nikalne ka.

    ReplyDelete
  7. awasthi ji agar tet ke pariksha mein 1 se 8 tak ke prashn aaye the iska matlab ye to nahi ki hum usme 8 pass waalon ko hi kaabil maan le.

    ReplyDelete
  8. srajendra ji main aapki baat se sahmat hoon, kyunki yahi sahi tareeka hai pratishat nikalne ka.

    ReplyDelete

Please do not use abusive/gali comment to hurt anybody OR to any authority. You can use moderated way to express your openion/anger. Express your views Intelligenly, So that Other can take it Seriously.
कृपया ध्यान रखें: अपनी राय देते समय अभद्र शब्द या भाषा का प्रयोग न करें। अभद्र शब्दों या भाषा का इस्तेमाल आपको इस साइट पर राय देने से प्रतिबंधित किए जाने का कारण बन सकता है। टिप्पणी लेखक का व्यक्तिगत विचार है और इसका संपादकीय नीति से कोई संबंध नहीं है। प्रासंगिक टिप्पणियां प्रकाशित की जाएंगी।