LT GRADE PROBATION CLEARANCE AND CHANGE OF RULE IN MIDDLE i.e. REVISED PANE FOR PRBATION CLEARANCE, COURT STAYED ON SUCH PANEL
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 4
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 7744 of 2015
Petitioner :- Yogendra Singh
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Siddharth Khare,Ashok Khare
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Nikhil Kumar
Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J.
Petitioners have appeared in the examination conducted by U.P. Secondary Education Services Selection Board, Allahabad for appointment on the post of Assistant Teacher in LT Grade for Mathematics pursuant to the Advertisement No. 1 of 2010. They were duly qualified and appointment letter were issued on various dates. They have joined their respective institutions in the month of March, April and May- June, 2014 and are continuing as such. All the petitioners have successfully completed their probation period and have been confirmed on the post of Assistant Teacher. A revised panel dated 16.12.2014 for the post of Assistant Teacher in LT Grade for Mathematics has been issued by the respondent-Board resulting into displacement of the petitioners and hence this writ petition.
Sri Ashok Khare, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners submits that the revised panel stated to have been issued pursuant to the order dated 27.3.2012 in Writ Petition No. 14110 of 2012 which was filed by certain unsuccessful candidates.
Submission is that there is no adjudication so far as the key answers are concerned and expert opinion was obtained by the Board. The re-valuation has been done without adhering to the proper procedure that too much after the selection has been finalised and appointment letters were issued to the petitioners. The petitioners were not heard at any point of time nor any notice was issued to them. They were taken by surprise by the revised panel published on 16.12.2014.
In Writ Petition No. 14110 of 2012, no counter affidavit has been filed by the respondent- Board bringing on record the manner in which the re-evaluation has been done.
Sri Nikhil Kumar, learned counsel has put in appearance on behalf of respondent no. 2.
Connect and put up this matter as fresh alongwith Writ Petition No. 14110 of 2012 on 10.2.2015.
However, till 10.2.2015, the effect and operation of revised panel published on 16.12.2014 shall remain stayed.
Order Date :- 9.2.2015/B.K.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 4
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 7744 of 2015
Petitioner :- Yogendra Singh
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Ors.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Siddharth Khare,Ashok Khare
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Nikhil Kumar
Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J.
Petitioners have appeared in the examination conducted by U.P. Secondary Education Services Selection Board, Allahabad for appointment on the post of Assistant Teacher in LT Grade for Mathematics pursuant to the Advertisement No. 1 of 2010. They were duly qualified and appointment letter were issued on various dates. They have joined their respective institutions in the month of March, April and May- June, 2014 and are continuing as such. All the petitioners have successfully completed their probation period and have been confirmed on the post of Assistant Teacher. A revised panel dated 16.12.2014 for the post of Assistant Teacher in LT Grade for Mathematics has been issued by the respondent-Board resulting into displacement of the petitioners and hence this writ petition.
Sri Ashok Khare, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners submits that the revised panel stated to have been issued pursuant to the order dated 27.3.2012 in Writ Petition No. 14110 of 2012 which was filed by certain unsuccessful candidates.
Submission is that there is no adjudication so far as the key answers are concerned and expert opinion was obtained by the Board. The re-valuation has been done without adhering to the proper procedure that too much after the selection has been finalised and appointment letters were issued to the petitioners. The petitioners were not heard at any point of time nor any notice was issued to them. They were taken by surprise by the revised panel published on 16.12.2014.
In Writ Petition No. 14110 of 2012, no counter affidavit has been filed by the respondent- Board bringing on record the manner in which the re-evaluation has been done.
Sri Nikhil Kumar, learned counsel has put in appearance on behalf of respondent no. 2.
Connect and put up this matter as fresh alongwith Writ Petition No. 14110 of 2012 on 10.2.2015.
However, till 10.2.2015, the effect and operation of revised panel published on 16.12.2014 shall remain stayed.
Order Date :- 9.2.2015/B.K.
