/* remove this */ Blogger Widgets /* remove this */

Friday, January 27, 2012

Without Amendment in U.P. Recognized Basic Schools (Junior High Schools) (Recruitment and Conditions of Service of Teachers) Rules, 1978, How TET Qualified Candidates are eligible for Junior Highschool

Without Amendment in U.P. Recognized Basic Schools (Junior High Schools) (Recruitment and Conditions of Service of Teachers) Rules, 1978, How TET Qualified Candidates are eligible for Junior Highschool

If I am correct, then above inference is derived from below Case details (Hearing shall be on 1st Feb 2012) -
-------------------
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

?Court No. - 2

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 54362 of 2011

Petitioner :- Indrasan Singh
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others
Petitioner Counsel :- R.P.Dubey,Manoj Kumar Singh
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,V.K.Kushwaha

Hon'ble Arun Tandon,J.
The Secretary of Education (Basic), U.P. Government at Lucknow may file an affidavit categorically disclosing as to how because of issuance of the Government Order dated 7th December, 2011 with reference to TET examination, it is being contended on behalf of the State that no appointment in a recognized and aided junior high schools can be made unless the candidate has passed his TET examination, when there has been no amendment in the statutory rules framed regulating the conditions and qualification for appointment of teachers in a recognized institution, namely, U.P. Recognized Basic Schools (Junior High Schools) (Recruitment and Conditions of Service of Teachers) Rules, 1978, more so when, no power has been given to the State Government under the Rules, 1978 to amend the qualifications by Executive Order. He shall also explain as to how merely because certain qualifications have been laid down by the National Council for Teachers Education in the matter of appointment of teachers, the State can insist when appropriate amendment in the statutory rules.

Statutory qualifications are binding qua appointment on the post of teachers in recognized institution. The process for recruitment had been initiated much prior to the issuance of the Government Order.

List this matter on 1st February, 2012.

(Arun Tandon, J.)

Order Date :- 12.1.2012
Sushil/-

---------------

If visitors have any updates of rules on such matters OR any better explanation, then you can give it through comments.

22 comments:

  1. Ab ye kya musibat gale pad gayi.
    Ghar se nikle the hausla karke
    Ghar laut aaye khuda khuda karke.

    ReplyDelete
  2. @Navedji,
    Provide NImavali details for Junior Highschool, And it is amended for TET Qualified candidates or not ?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Muskan ji junior high school me ab tak koi vacancy nahi nikli h phir amendment ki kya jarurat h jab vacancy niklegi u sse pahle amendment kar liya jayega.please explaine

    ReplyDelete
  4. @Nitooji,I felt -
    "When UPTET conducted, TET exam was also conducted for class VI-VIII,
    But may be its niyamavali not amended.
    Question is how TET qualified candidates can be eligible for Junior Highschool teacher."
    And u people can also read case and give explanation.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Through this case another point is (Ifelt )-
    TET examination conducted before G.O. of 7th Dec.
    then -
    TET Qualified candidates (for VI-VIII) are eligible for Upper PRT or not
    ----------
    Another prob.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Koi baat nahin,
    case TET qualified valon ke favour main hee hoga.
    Ye poochna chaihe tha ki, NCTE ko aisa niyam kaise jaree kia kee TET qualified log hee patr hain PRT , Upper PRT ke liye.
    Jab UP mein niyam hee sansodhan nahin hua.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Koi baat nahin,
    case TET qualified valon ke favour main hee hoga.
    Ye poochna chaihe tha ki, NCTE ko aisa niyam kaise jaree kia kee TET qualified log hee patr hain PRT , Upper PRT ke liye.
    Jab UP mein niyam hee sansodhan nahin hua.
    (Agar case is niyam ke liye hai )

    ReplyDelete
  8. Muskan ji kya amendment se pahle prapt ki gyi degree valid nahi hogi.mujhe confirm nahi h 1996 me prt me sayad pahli bar bed liye gye the kya amendment se pahle bed holder select nahi hue the.mera manna h tet alag prakriya h aur recruitment alag.iska matalab to ye hua ki ek tet karane ke bad koi bhi gov 5 sal tak amendment nahi kar payegi kyonki crtfikt ki validity 5 sal h.aur kabhi bhi nahi kar payegi kyoki tet hr 6 mahine bad organise hoga.muskan ji adalat kanun ke sath sath tarko ke aadhar par decision deti h.aur in sabse bhi upar h judge ka apna vivek.koi bhi judge apne vivekanusar sakshyo ke viprit decision de sakta h.aap kisi bhi lawyer se confirm kar sakte h.

    ReplyDelete
  9. ye baat pakki hai ki aaj nahin to kal bina tet ke koi teacher para nahin payega school chahe sarkari ho ya pvt. doosri baat hc ne aadesh diya hai ki manrega main majdooron ko pradesh sarkar dwara state main nirdharit min. majdoori denihogi. kabhi yesa bhi hoga tet paas wale chahe govt. school main parayen ya pvt main salary barabar hogi.

    ReplyDelete
  10. maidam kya hamare upper tet k marksheet/digree per v sankat k badal aa gae kya??? jara khol k batane ka kast kare.. thanks!!!

    ReplyDelete
  11. hamse kya bhool huai jo a saza hum komili band pad gai teacher banane ki sari gali, hum se kya bhool huai jo a saz.....

    ReplyDelete
  12. Anju ji where are you from? Can tell abt faizabad tet crft available

    ReplyDelete
  13. Barutha ji aap to village jane wale the?

    ReplyDelete
  14. baruta ji aapse sprem vinti h ki aap apani bhasha ka primarjan kare.kyonki pata nahi aap humesa majak ke mood me kyo rahte h

    ReplyDelete
  15. program cancel hogaya! neeetoo ji majak to gov. ne banaya hai.

    ReplyDelete
  16. @ Muskan ji
    (January 27, 2012 7:47 PM)

    ur doubt is correct the niyamawali is partially amended.

    The full niyamawali is here:


    http://upbasiceducationboard.in/(S(t35ys445cjl5aduyi3xw2u55))/images/GoImage/niyama20.gif




    For complete niyamawali put 21,22,23... further on the place of 20 in the above link

    ReplyDelete
  17. How many cases of Kapil Dev Yadav is in court -
    http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=1634023
    ------------------------
    This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Deputy Registrar(Copying).


    HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

    ?Court No. - 2

    Case :- WRIT - A No. - 16279 of 2011

    Petitioner :- Kapil Dev Yadav And Others
    Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others
    Petitioner Counsel :- Siddharth Khare,Shri Ashok Khare
    Respondent Counsel :- C. S. C.,A.K.Pandey,A.K.Shukla,Manoj Kumar Dwivedi

    Hon'ble Arun Tandon,J.
    This Court while entertaining the present writ petition on 29th March, 2011 passed following order:

    ReplyDelete
  18. शिक्षक) नियम, 1978 की सेवा की शर्तें कैसे TET अर्हताप्राप्त उम्मीदवारों जूनियर हाईस्कूल के लिए पात्र हैं उत्तर प्रदेश में संशोधन के बिना बेसिक स्कूल (जूनियर हाई स्कूल) (भर्ती और शिक्षकों की सेवा की शर्तें) नियम, 1978, कैसे TET अर्हताप्राप्त उम्मीदवारों जूनियर हाईस्कूल के लिए पात्र हैं मान्यता प्राप्त अगर मैं सही हूँ, तो ऊपर निष्कर्ष प्रकरण विवरण नीचे से व्युत्पन्न है (सुनकर 1 फ़रवरी, 2012 पर किया जाएगा) - ------------------- इलाहाबाद में महकमा के उच्च न्यायालय ? कोर्ट सं - 2 प्रकरण: - रिट - 2011 - 54362 के एक सं. याचिकाकर्ता: - Indrasan सिंह प्रतिवादी: - उत्तर प्रदेश स्टेट और दूसरों याचिकाकर्ता वकील: - आर.पी. दुबे, मनोज कुमार सिंह प्रतिवादी वकील: - C.S.C., वी.के. कुशवाहा माननीय अरुण टंडन, जे. शिक्षा सचिव (बेसिक), उत्तर प्रदेश लखनऊ में सरकार ने एक हलफनामा स्पष्ट फ़ाइल asto खुलासा कैसे सरकार TETexamination करने के लिए संदर्भ के साथ 7 दिसंबर,2011 को आदेश जारी करने के की वजह से, यह राज्य है कि एक मान्यता प्राप्त और सहायता प्राप्त जूनियर हाई स्कूलों में कोई नियुक्ति किया जा सकता है की ओर से किया जा रहा दलील है हो सकता है जब तक उम्मीदवार passedhis TETपरीक्षा बना दिया है, जब वहाँ सांविधिक शर्तों और किसी मान्यता प्राप्त संस्थान में शिक्षकों की नियुक्ति के लिए योग्यता, अर्थात्, विनियमन उत्तर प्रदेश के लिए बनाए गए नियमों में कोई संशोधन किया गया है बेसिक स्कूल (जूनियर HighSchools) (भर्ती और शिक्षकों की सेवा की शर्तें) नियम, 1978 है, तो और अधिक, जब कोई शक्ति नियम, 1978 के तहत किया गया है राज्य सरकार को दिया कार्यकारी आदेश द्वारा योग्यता में संशोधन के मान्यता प्राप्त है. उन्होंने यह भी केवल कैसे क्योंकि कुछ योग्यता शिक्षक शिक्षा के लिए शिक्षकों की नियुक्ति के मामले में राष्ट्रीय परिषद द्वारा किया गया है निर्धारित करने के लिए के रूप में समझा जाएगा, राज्य सांविधिक नियमों में जब appropriateamendment जोर करसकते हैं. अधिक एक

    ReplyDelete
  19. So many cases filed by the name "Kapil" -
    HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

    ?Court No. - 7

    Case :- WRIT - A No. - 72657 of 2011

    Petitioner :- Kapil Dev Singh & Others
    Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
    Petitioner Counsel :- Awadhesh Kumar
    Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,Rajeshwar Singh

    Hon'ble Dilip Gupta,J.
    The petitioners had earlier filed Writ Petition No. 48261 of 2011 which was disposed of on 25th August, 2011 with the following observations:-
    "The petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated 21st July, 2011 passed by the District Basic Education Officer, Kushi Nagar regarding adjustment/transfer of certain Head Masters of the Primary Schools as Assistant Teachers in the Senior Basic Schools.
    It is the contention of learned counsel for the petitioners that under the relevant Government Order they cannot be adjusted as Assistant Teachers in Science in Senior Basic Schools as they are not Science teachers. It is, however, stated that against the aforesaid order, the petitioners have filed a representation before the District Basic Education Officer, Kushi Nagar which is pending. The relief pressed for by learned counsel for the petitioners at the time of hearing of this petition is that the said representation may be decided.
    Learned Standing Counsel appears for respondent Nos. 1 and 2, while Sri Rajeshwar Singh appears for respondent Nos. 3 and 4.
    Learned counsel for the respondents state that the representation filed by the petitioners shall be decided expeditiously.
    In view of the aforesaid, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the District Basic Education Officer, Kushi Nagar to pass an appropriate order on the representation filed by the petitioners expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is filed by the petitioners.
    It is made clear that the Court has not adjudicated upon the merits of the case which shall be examined by the District Basic Education Officer, Kushi Nagar in accordance with law."
    It is stated that pursuant to the aforesaid order, the District Basic Education Officer passed an order dated 15th October, 2011 withdrawing the adjustment order but at the same time issued fresh order for transfer of the petitioners to other Institutions.
    The petitioners have challenged this order on the ground that such transfer is not permissible.�
    A supplementary affidavit has been filed by the petitioners in which the order dated 23rd November, 2011 passed by the District Basic Education Officer has been annexed. This order mentions that if the petitioners withdraw the writ petition and the complaints filed by them, then they shall be retained in the Institution from where they have been transferred.
    It is, therefore, the submission of learned counsel for the petitioners that the transfer order had been issued because the petitioners had served copies of the writ petition upon learned counsel appearing for the District Basic Education Officer. He, therefore, submits that the transfer order should be set aside.
    Prima facie, the submission advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners finds support from the order dated 23rd November, 2011 passed by the District Basic Education Officer.
    The District Basic Education Officer, who is represented by Sri Rajeshwar Singh, shall file his personal affidavit to explain why such an order could be passed. Detailed counter affidavit may also be filed within four weeks. Rejoinder affidavit, if any, may be filed within two weeks thereafter.
    List this petition for admission/hearing in the week commencing 20th February, 2012.
    The operation of the order dated 15th October, 2011 to the extent it seeks to transfer the petitioners shall remain stayed till the next date of listing.
    Order Date :- 22.12.2011
    NSC
    ----------
    http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=1598344

    ReplyDelete
  20. Please read the amendment at following address and then explain

    http://www.scertup.org/Primary_Teacher_Niyukti_niyamawali_12th_sanshodhan.pdf

    ReplyDelete
  21. KANPUR ME JIS JIS CANDIDATE KE FORMS WAPAS AA GAYE HAIN NEECHE DIYE HUYE NUMBERS PE CONTACT KARE...

    9807673084 :: PANKAJ DIXIT

    8960732422 :: BRIJESH PRAJAPATI

    8574407131 :: SHAILESH BAJPAI

    WE NEED SUPPORT YOUR SUPPORT TO GET THE JUSTICE.. TODAY I WENT TO GPO KANPUR .. HEAD POSTY MASTER MR. RAM BHAROSA

    TOLD US THAT GIVE AN APPLICATION WITH ALL DETAILS .. WE WILL SURELY GIVE U EXPLAINATION REGARDING YOUR PROBLEM..
    AND ALSO HE TOLD US THAT IN 2007 AND IN 2008 DUE TO THE CARELESSNESS OF POSTAL DEPARTMENT .. SOME CANDIDATES GOT THEIR VBTC FORMS BACK ..THEY CAME TO US AND WE GAVE THEM EXPLAINATION AND AFTER GETTING EXPLANATION IN WRITTEN.. THEY WENT TO COURT AND COURT ORDERED DIET TO ACCEPT THEIR FORMS .. SO WE HAVE A CHANCE TO APPLY AGAIN ..
    ITS BETTER TO BE A UNIT AND GET THE JUSTICE
    THANKXX

    ReplyDelete
  22. Hello friends main arvind kumar s/o Mr. Kirti Prasad BSA(Basic Shiksha Adhikari)
    mujhe papa ne kaha hai ki apne hak ke liye supreme court jana hoga to main bhi SC ja raha hu
    please mujhe support karne ke liye mujhe call kare.....
    arvind kumar
    mob-9458617169

    ReplyDelete

Please do not use abusive/gali comment to hurt anybody OR to any authority. You can use moderated way to express your openion/anger. Express your views Intelligenly, So that Other can take it Seriously.
कृपया ध्यान रखें: अपनी राय देते समय अभद्र शब्द या भाषा का प्रयोग न करें। अभद्र शब्दों या भाषा का इस्तेमाल आपको इस साइट पर राय देने से प्रतिबंधित किए जाने का कारण बन सकता है। टिप्पणी लेखक का व्यक्तिगत विचार है और इसका संपादकीय नीति से कोई संबंध नहीं है। प्रासंगिक टिप्पणियां प्रकाशित की जाएंगी।